Good Faith and Economic Competition
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
economic analysis of good faith in contract performance
the rule of necessity to respect the principle of good faith in performance of the contract is the result of :union: rights and ethics. good faith in performance of the contract with subjective and objective criteria and using cost-benefit analysis, wealth maximization, game theory, efficiency and welfare standards, leading to the achievement of the objectives set by the parties of contract. la...
متن کاملCompetition in Healthcare: Good, Bad or Ugly?
The role of competition in healthcare is much debated. Despite a wealth of international experience in relation to competition, evidence is mixed and contested and the debate about the potential role for competition is often polarised. This paper considers briefly some of the reasons for this, focusing on what is meant by “competition in healthcare” and why it is more valuable to think about th...
متن کاملgood faith in iranian law
good faith is a flexible and subjective phrase. it is used in a variety of contexts and its meaning varies in these contexts. in ownership, possession in good faith means possession of property by a person who in good faith does not know that the property's ownership is disputed. possessor believes actually and reasonably himself or herself to be the lawful occupant, otherwise he is in bad...
متن کاملElectronic Agents and Contract Performance: Good Faith and Fair Dealing
This paper examines how the civil law principle of good faith and the common law notion of fair dealing apply during the performance of contracts. After a brief look at their application in the precontractual stage, there is an examination of the notion of good faith and fair dealing in contract performance. Reference is made to the duty of the parties to act loyally and to co-operate during th...
متن کاملDel Monte Dunes, Good Faith, and Land Use Regulation
The U.S. Supreme Court’s property rights jurisprudence always has had a Delphic quality. During this century, its seminal expressions have been Justice Holmes’ enigmatic “too far” language in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon and Justice Brennan’s reliance on the amorphous conception of “investment-backed expectations” in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York. The Court’s 1999 decisi...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Acta Oeconomica Pragensia
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0572-3043,1804-2112
DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.325